The Chained Muse

The Chained Muse

Share this post

The Chained Muse
The Chained Muse
Romanticism and the Roses of Pieria

Romanticism and the Roses of Pieria

By Michael R. Burch

David Gosselin's avatar
David Gosselin
Mar 03, 2025
∙ Paid
8

Share this post

The Chained Muse
The Chained Muse
Romanticism and the Roses of Pieria
5
2
Share
Apollo and Marsyas by José de Ribera

A thing of beauty is a joy forever.
Its loveliness increases; it will never
pass into nothingness …

—John Keats

An old question resurfaced recently: What is Romanticism?

Were the great English Romantics — William Blake, William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Lord Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley and John Keats — mostly about nature poetry and sensuous imagery, or was there more to the movement than meets the eye, or ear?

We must immediately acknowledge that each member of the “big six” was, first and foremost, an individual. It’s hard to think of two poets more different than Blake and Byron. Or Keats and Byron.

Individuals, yes, but what did the big six have in common?

Why do they seem like Hart Crane’s “visionary company” despite their obvious differences?

I consider myself a Romantic poet, so I will begin with my own “prime directive,” which I will call “the Roses of Pieria.”

For those unfamiliar with the term, in Greek mythology the Roses of Pieria grew …

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Chained Muse to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 David Gosselin
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share