The Chained Muse

The Chained Muse

Share this post

The Chained Muse
The Chained Muse
Van Eyck: True Beauty, a Foretaste of Divine Wisdom

Van Eyck: True Beauty, a Foretaste of Divine Wisdom

By Karel Vereycken

David Gosselin's avatar
David Gosselin
May 30, 2024
∙ Paid
8

Share this post

The Chained Muse
The Chained Muse
Van Eyck: True Beauty, a Foretaste of Divine Wisdom
29
1
Share

Jan Van Eyck (1390-1441). How might we grasp the intention of this great Flemish painter, despite the five hundred years which separate us? Apart from looking at his work, here are three tracks that I’ve been able to uncover:

  • The painter was undoubtedly initiated in the art of lectio divina, the multi-leveled interpretation of sacred texts;

  • The influence of the French religious thinker Hugue of Saint Victor (1096-1141), an unknown but major figure who was an inspiration for the philosopher-cardinal Nicolas of Cusa;

  • The advice given to the painter by theologian Denis the Carthusian (1401-1471), the confessor of Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy, for whom the painter carried out diplomatic missions.

The author would encourage all admirers of great art to get themselves a copy of the inspiring and scholarly work Landschap in Wereldbeeld, van Van Eyck tot Rembrandt (Landscape and Worldview, from Van Eyck to Rembrandt) by the Dutch art historian Boudewijn Bakker (published in 2004 at Thoth in Bossum, Netherlands, available in English). In a very rigorous and yet accessible work, Bakker offers us a series of important clues, which allow a XXIst century viewer to gain new insights into the often “hidden” meaning of Dutch and Flemish painting. For today’s viewers, what is often surprising in these works is the use of recurring references by the painters, their sponsors, religious officials and the general public of these countries.

Paradox

Adam, detail of the altar piece of Ghent (1432), Jan Van Eyck.

Before I read Bakker’s work, the paintings of northern Europe often appeared to me to be opposed to the prevailing philosophical and religious matrix of the fifteenth century, when in reality they were its very expression. Until now, I thought that, for the most part, the world view that prevailed at the end of the Middle-Ages was one rejecting the visible world as it was known through our senses. According to a scholastic misinterpretation of St. Augustine and Plato, the world was only deception and temptation, which one might have called the devil himself. Now, and herein lies the paradox in all its force, how can we reconcile the rejection of the visible world, particularly in sight of the work of the Flemish painter Van Eyck, who was able to show us human beings animated by kindness, glowing with beauty and surrounded by pristine nature?

I thought “How dare he show us so much beauty,” whereas in his day the doctrine of faith, which had been heralded as guardian of the temple, had kept reminding us that Man, in his glaring imperfection, was no God, and systematically warned us against the temptations of this world? Were the ironic but extremely moralizing pictures of Hieronymus Bosch and Joachim Patinier not intended to make us understand, albeit with violence, and yet with humor and great craft, that the origin of sin lay precisely in our excessive attachments to worldly things and the pleasures which were believed to be derived from them?

The Coincidence of Opposites

The philosopher-cardinal Nicolas of Cusa (Cusanus)

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Chained Muse to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 David Gosselin
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share